S. Fanselow
To Win
A. Berger
To Win
Darian King vs Sebastian Fanselow Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W W L L W W
Form
W L L W W L W L L LHead-To-Head: King 1 - 0 Fanselow
They have played 2 sets in total, with King winning 2 and Fanselow winning 0. The last match between King and Fanselow was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 30-10-2023, Q3, I.hard with Darian King getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Darian King | 1 |
| Sebastian Fanselow | 0 |
Charlottesville Challenger(30-10-2023)
6
3
6
2
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Stearns VS Birrell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vukic VS Nishikori PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Darian King
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:25:23 | Average Match Time | 1:25:23 |
| 59% (26/44) | 1st Serve % | 50% (32/64) |
| 69% (18/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 56% (10/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (11/32) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 58% (37/64) | Return Points Win % | 36% (16/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Darian King Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael De Alba
Player
Darian King
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Darian King
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
7
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darian King
Player
Enmanuel Munoz
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
77%
(
34 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Darian King
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Tracy
Player
Darian King
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Darian King
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
1
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
6
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Djonov
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
15 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Maik Steiner
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
13
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
41%
(
26 of
63)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Hazem Naow
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
54%
(
67 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
75 of
113)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
53%
(
30 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
50 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
118
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (408/243) | Win/Loss | 59% (369/253) |
| 60% (905/616) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (829/607) |
| 54% (7539/6491) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7174/6300) |
| 65% (287/154) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (204/121) |
| 63% (90/54) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (127/96) |
| 49% (26/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (38/35) |
| 38% (5/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 759 | Aces Total | 1784 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 846 | Total Double Faults | 1920 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:29:23 |
| 554.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.85 |
| 66% (18153/27338) | 1st Serve % | 59% (22066/37275) |
| 65% (11723/18153) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (15298/22066) |
| 51% (4700/9183) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7480/15208) |
| 44% (1346/3086) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1727/4011) |
| 42% (11833/28123) | Return Points Win % | 41% (15481/37461) |
| 45% (14/17) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 74% (28/10) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (13/16) | Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (120/101) | Challenger W/L | 49% (124/129) |
| 71% (226/91) | Futures W/L | 67% (244/120) |
| 62% (382/614) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (364/614) |
| 70% (21/30) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (85/152) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (71/152) |
| 63% (119/190) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (103/198) |
| 91% (362/331) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (361/314) |
| 9% (362/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (361/47) |
| 26% (289/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (261/55) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
